• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A growing number of creatives are skeptical about using AI-edited images in their work. They worry that the results might seem fabricated, lose authenticity, or even damage their reputation. These reservations are valid and deserve attention.

AI image editing tools have made tremendous strides, but they are still imperfect. Some images still show subtle glitches, odd lighting, or digitally smoothed details that sharp observers can identify.

Nonetheless, the key is not to dismiss the technology but to integrate it thoughtfully. The optimal solution combines machine speed with human oversight. A trained visual artist can review AI-generated edits, apply precise tweaks, and confirm the result reflects the core narrative.

check this collaborative process preserves the authenticity of the visual content while reducing turnaround and lowering expenses. Clients and audiences are increasingly aware with visual retouching, and as long as the end result reads as authentic and polished, the vast majority won’t object—or won’t mind—the use of AI.

Transparency also helps. If a company opting to share that AI was used in image editing, it often enhances credibility rather than undermines it. Ultimately, AI should be seen as a resource that elevates creatives, not eliminates them. When used with intention, it enhances rather than undermines professionalism.

The real aim isn’t to create perfect synthetic visuals but to convey meaning effectively, honestly, and impactfully.