• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Individuals increasingly use AI-powered headshot generators for fast, polished portraits without the expense and scheduling of a studio session. While these tools can be convenient, they often lead to underwhelming outcomes if used negligently. A frequent blunder is using unclear source files. When the input photo suffers from blur, bad lighting, or an unnatural pose, the AI will produce unreliable enhancements and may create unsettling facial artifacts.

Another frequent error is submitting photos captured in uncontrolled settings. AI headshot services work best with clear, frontal images taken on a plain, solid-color backdrop, not photos taken in front of a messy room or bright window.

Users often upload multiple looks and facial expressions, thinking more options yield superior outcomes. This can overload the algorithm and create mismatched outputs across your collection of headshots. Opt for just one or two clean, evenly lit poses.

Some users also assume the AI will fix anything, including unflattering body alignment or unnatural angles. AI cannot fabricate natural posture—it can only improve upon the input. Should your source image show poor posture or averted gaze, the final portrait will inherit the problem.

Many overlook platform-specific requirements. Every service enforces unique rules around dimensions, clarity, and backdrop, and ignoring the technical specs can cause processing errors or rejection.

Too many users skip the final quality check. These tools produce highly realistic portraits, but it can also create subtle oddities like mismatched lighting, strange skin tones, or overly smooth textures. Carefully inspect every generated image before posting or sending the final versions.

Taking a few extra minutes to prepare good source material and complying precisely with requirements will prevent costly rework and yield superior outcomes.