• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

UCLA neuroscientists reported Monday that they've transferred a memory from one animal to a different through injections of RNA, a startling consequence that challenges the widely held view of where and the way recollections are stored in the mind. The discovering from the lab of David Glanzman hints on the potential for new RNA-based mostly remedies to in the future restore lost recollections and, if right, may shake up the field of memory and studying. "It’s fairly shocking," said Dr. Todd Sacktor, a neurologist and memory researcher at SUNY Downstate Medical Heart in Brooklyn, N.Y. "The big image is we’re understanding the essential alphabet of how reminiscences are saved for the primary time." He was not involved in the analysis, which was printed in eNeuro, the net journal of the Society for Neuroscience. If you're enjoying this text, consider supporting our award-profitable journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you might be helping to ensure the future of impactful tales concerning the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

Many scientists are anticipated to view the research more cautiously. The work is in snails, animals that have confirmed a robust model organism for neuroscience however whose simple brains work far differently than these of people. The experiments will should be replicated, together with in animals with more complex brains. And the results fly in the face of a large quantity of evidence supporting the deeply entrenched concept that recollections are saved through changes in the strength of connections, or synapses, between neurons. "If he’s proper, this can be absolutely earth-shattering," mentioned Tomás Ryan, an assistant professor at Trinity Faculty Dublin, whose lab hunts for engrams, or the physical traces of memory. Glanzman is aware of his unceremonial demotion of the synapse isn't going to go over properly in the sector. "I anticipate quite a lot of astonishment and skepticism," he said. Even his personal colleagues have been dubious. "It took me a very long time to convince the individuals in my lab to do the experiment," he mentioned.

Glanzman’s experiments-funded by the National Institutes of Health and MemoryWave Guide the National Science Foundation-concerned giving mild electrical shocks to the marine snail Aplysia californica. Shocked snails learn to withdraw their delicate siphons and gills for almost a minute as a protection once they subsequently receive a weak contact; snails that have not been shocked withdraw only briefly. The researchers extracted RNA from the nervous systems of snails that had been shocked and injected the material into unshocked snails. RNA’s primary function is to function a messenger inside cells, carrying protein-making instructions from its cousin DNA. But when this RNA was injected, these naive snails withdrew their siphons for extended periods of time after a gentle touch. Management snails that received injections of RNA from snails that had not obtained shocks did not withdraw their siphons for as long. "It’s as if we transferred a memory," Glanzman mentioned. Glanzman’s group went additional, displaying that Aplysia sensory neurons in Petri dishes were more excitable, as they tend to be after being shocked, if they had been exposed to RNA from shocked snails.

Exposure to RNA from snails that had never been shocked didn't trigger the cells to turn out to be more excitable. The results, said Glanzman, suggest that recollections may be stored throughout the nucleus of neurons, the place RNA is synthesized and might act on DNA to turn genes on and off. He said he thought memory storage involved these epigenetic adjustments-adjustments within the activity of genes and not within the DNA sequences that make up these genes-that are mediated by RNA. This view challenges the extensively held notion that reminiscences are stored by enhancing synaptic connections between neurons. Slightly, Glanzman sees synaptic changes that occur throughout memory formation as flowing from the data that the RNA is carrying. "This thought is radical and definitely challenges the field," stated Li-Huei Tsai, a neuroscientist who directs the Picower Institute for Studying and MemoryWave Guide Memory at the Massachusetts Institute of Expertise. Tsai, who just lately co-authored a serious assessment on memory formation, known as Glanzman’s study "impressive and interesting" and stated quite a lot of research support the notion that epigenetic mechanisms play some position in memory formation, which is probably going a fancy and multifaceted course of.